Analysis of False Reasons of Christians and Lawyers for Church Corporate, 501(c)(3) Status or Legal Status of Any Kind

Jerald Finney Churches under Christ Ministry

Website of typical modern “church” in America, Trinity Fellowship in Amarillo TX. Click image above to go to website.

Heretics and apostates proclaim that churches cannot do things God’s way, as did the churches in the New Testament. This page links to resources which analyze their false reasons for betraying our Lord in organization, goal, doctrine, and practice. They embrace and preach a social gospel, not a Bible gospel. Their authority is the tradition of men and the rudiments of the world, not the Word of God. Their pastors and leaders are hirelings whose goal is to bring into their organization as many people as they can, not to lead people to the Lord and then add them to the “church.”

Their churches are business organizations. A business finds out what people want and gives it to them. They tickle the ears of their congregants, entertain them, and make them temporarily happy. In return, the people keep their businesses funded. They preach much on serving and giving. The sad thing is that the people are not serving and giving to God. They are giving to the corporation. Their gifts go into the corporate bank account.

Except for God’s remnant, pastors, so-called Christian attorneys, Bible College, divinity school, and seminary presidents and “professors” give a lot of excuses for violating New Testament church doctrine and example. They believe that a church in America must follow man made tradition and doctrine; that they must do things differently than did New Testament churches. They give a lot of reasons for their betrayal of our Lord:

I. The modern church must, unlike New Testament churches must:

A. own property; B. enter into worldly contracts; C. go into debt; D. be charged with crime; E. provide a way for members to sue—in a civil court where Bible arguments will not be heard— each other, the pastor, the church, the state, etc.; F. enter into contracts, as opposed to honoring God’s relevant Bible covenants and commandments; G. limit liability of members to those who might be injured on property belonging to the church; H. guarantee a tax deduction to those members who give to the church corporation; I. pay the pastor a salary (make a hireling of him); J. operate like a business, using business, not Bible, methods. Those methods include:

  1. finding out what the people in the community want (community surveys) and giving it to them in return for the people filling the corporate coffers (which they describe as building the kingdom);
  2.  provide worldly entertainment such as “Christian” rock music and concerts (which they call “worship) in a nightclub atmosphere; sports (basketball, softball, etc.) facilities and competitions;
  3. forming elderly, youth, sports (basketball, softball, etc.) other groups each of which can be provided with entertainment and activities which appeal to the group;
  4. teach and practice “philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of man, after the rudiments of the world” (they entice by advertising: “experience God, find community, fulfill your purpose”).

II. Romans 13 and other Scripture requires them to abide by every law of man (even though the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and corresponding state constitutional provisions protect religious freedom and churches who wish to do things God’s way);

III. being “practical” as opposed to standing on the principles of the Word of God;

1. The primary false reason for corporate 501c3 status or related types of organization, given by many pastors and believers, is that Romans 13 (or some other verses such as 1 Peter 2.13) requires them to do so. They will say, for example, “We believe in obeying civil government as required by Romans 13.” First, no law in America requires a church to organize as an established entity, an entity under man’s law. In fact, the religion clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, the highest law of the land, mandates that churches can organize any way they wish, even as spiritual entities under Christ and Christ alone according to New Testament Church doctrine.

To understand the history and meaning of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, see The History of the First Amendment, Course on the History of the First AmendmentAn Abridged History of the First Amendment;

The Romans 13 and related arguments – such as “We should obey civil government,” and “We do not want to fight civil government.” Paul, Peter, and all the apostles except John, who was exiled on the isle of Patmos were martyred because they would not bow down to civil government when the highest power, God, required them to act contrary to the rules of civil government. What about Elijah, Moses, Daniel, Shadrach Meshach, and Abednego? See the following for thorough analysies of these false arguments:

2. To hold property:

3. Many believers – in deciding church organization and doctrine – ask, “Is it pragmatic [or practical.”  The question should be, “Is it biblical,” not “Is it practical” or “Is it pragmatic.”  Click here to go to a sermon by Evangelist Randy Keener gives an excellent analysis of “pragmatism” versus “biblical doctrine.”  Violation of the New Testament Church Doctrine sooner or later brings negative consequences for the cause of Christ. This is especially true when churches violate the principle that Christ should be the only authority over His churches and that things should be done God’s way. Look at the history and state of “churches” and “Christianity” in America, except for a small remnant, for proof.

4. ANSWER TO A BIBLE COLLEGE VICE-PRESIDENT’S ARTICLE ON CHURCH INCORPORATION: “TO INCORPORATE OR NOT TO INCORPORATE?”

5. A variety of false reasons are examined in Separation of Church and State/God’s Churches: Spiritual or Legal Entities? The reasons examined in that book are:

6. Here are some resources which reveal the truth about false reasons given by “Christian” lawyers for church legal entity status:

7. My reply to pastor teaching on Matthew 16.18 and Ephesians 1.22 thereafter questioned by accountant about church non-taxable status and the First Amendment (011419)

8. Legal answer to Pastor’s inquiry concerning whether a potential donor of substantial gift can claim a tax deduction under IRC Section 508 even though the church will not give an IRS acknowledgement

9. Believe it or not, another false reason by some unlearned believers for church establishment (corporate, 501(c)(3) or 508(c)(1)(A) tax exempt status, charitable trust status, or any church status created, defined, and controlled by man’s law) is: “The Bible does not say that a church should not incorporate, get tax exempt status, or organize under man’s law.” Another pastor stated the same argument in a different way this way: “We are Bible believers. If the Bible says do not do something, we do not do it.” The following short essay addresses that frivolous argument: According to the Bible, God Grieves when a Church Chooses to Organize Under Any Law of Man (Non-Profit Corporation Law, Federal Tax Exempt Law, Charitable Trust Law, Etc.).

Click here to go to Questions, from Pastors and Others, and Answers on Various Matters.

"Churches under Christ" is a ministry of Charity Baptist Tabernacle of Amarillo, Texas, Benjamin Hickam Pastor. Jerald Finney, a Christian Lawyer and member of Charity Baptist Tabernacle explains how a church in America can remain under the Lord Jesus Christ and Him only. "And hath put all things under his feet, and gave him to be the head over all things to the church" (Ephesians 1.22).

%d bloggers like this: