Click here to go to the following webpage for Table of Contents with links to all chapters of: Simply Church: The Holy Union of Christ and His Local Church

Appendix 1 gives links to resources which explain why church incorporation, federal tax exempt status, and other statutory or legal status of churches betray the love relationship between Christ and His churches.

Appendix 2 looks at common law versus statutory law church Bible Trust considerations.

Copyright © by Jerald Finney
February 9, 2023

Why not use the term “steward” instead of “trustee?” Over the years, several have suggested that “steward” should be used. For example, a gentleman at an Unregistered Baptist Fellowship Conference said to me something others have commented on over the years, “We use the term steward because Biblical law is over man’s law.”  This chapter will look at Bible teaching to address this and related matters:  the meanings of the words “steward,” “trust,” “trustee,” “beneficiary,” “trust estate;” the eternal and temporal applications of the relationship; just versus unjust stewardship according to God; and the consequences of just and unjust application of the relationship. This lesson will explain why the use of “trustee” is appropriate and preferable.

The Bible explains the God-ordained trust relationship with all property and the functions of each party to the trust relationship. That relationship has a trustor, a trustee or steward, a beneficiary, and a trust estate. The term “trust” is used in the Bible; “trustee” is explained but the term “trustee” is not used in the Bible. “Steward” is used in the Bible. Like “Trustee,” “Steward” refers to the person to whom someone commits the care and management of his goods for his benefit.

One use of term “trust” references a relationship with property, either material or spiritual. “Trust,” in the context of the trust relationship with property, means: “Property committed to a person’s care for use or management, and for which an account must be rendered. Every man’s talents and advantages are a trust committed to him by his Maker, and for the use or employment of which he is accountable.”

The suffix -or means a person who is something, such as lessor (a person who leases property) or trustor (a person who declares a trust relationship with property). A trustor commits, to the care of someone, God’s property for the sole benefit of God, the owner of the property, the owner of the property held in the trust estate. New Testament churches never owned or falsely claimed ownership of property; they were spiritual entities only, entirely separate from civil government and worldly entanglements. See, Is a Church a Spiritual or Legal Entity? In the context of the Bible trust declareded by a church, the trustor, a derivative of the term “trust,” declares the trust relationship—not with property of the church, since the church, when in obedience to the Word of God, claims ownership of no earthly property, but with property of the true owner of all things, God..

The suffix -ee is used (1) with some verbs to make nouns meaning someone who is affected by an action—as a trainee or an employee-and (2) with some verbs to make nouns meaning someone who performs an action—as a lessee, escapee. When added to the word trust, we have “trustee,” someone who performs an action. A trustee property held in trust for the true owner of the property holds and manages property for the benefit of the owner of the property. Thus, even though the term “trustee” is not specifically mentioned in the Bible, trustee accurately describes the one to whom God has entrusted His property.

The beneficiary – that is, the true, equitable, and beneficial owner – of the property held in a Bible trust is the Lord Jesus Christ, and all of the properties of the trust estate are held in trust, by the trustee, solely for the benefit of the Lord Jesus Christ who is the true, equitable, and beneficial owner of all property including all property held in the trust. The trustor, in declaring the church Bible trust relationship with property is not naming or making the Lord Jesus Christ the Beneficiary or the Trust Estate; Christ is the Beneficiary–the true, equitable, and beneficial owner of the earth and all that is in it (Exodus 19:5, Leviticus 25:23, 1 Chronicles 29:11-12, Psalm 24:1, Psalm 50:10, Psalm 89:11, Haggai 2:8).

The term “trust” refers to both temporal/earthly or material and eternal/heavenly or spiritual relationships. “Trust” relationships are found throughout the Bible, even when the word “trust,” “trustee,” or “steward” is not mentioned. Luke 16 speaks of a temporal material trust, and relates that trust to an eternal spiritual trust. 1 Thessalonians 2.4, and Titus 1.11 speak specifically and solely of the eternal spiritual trust.

The first time the relationship is mentioned is in Genesis 1.27-31, where obviously, although not explicitly stated, the relationship is both earthly and spiritual:

• “27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. 28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth. 29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which isupon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which isthe fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat. 30 And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so. 31 And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.”

All such earthly and spiritual relationships have several essentials: the possession(s); the true, equitable, and beneficial owner of the possession(s); the commitment by the true owner of the possession(s) to another’s care and management; and the one to whom is entrusted the care and management of the possession(s) for the benefit of the true owner. Every Bible dispensation presents a specific stewardship under God.

Only once in the Bible, in Luke 16.1-13, are the words “steward” and “trust” used in the same passage. That passage is concerned with an earthly steward dealing with earthly possessions of his earthly master, the true owner of the possessions. There, “steward” refers to the person who has a duty to manage the goods of his master, for his master’s benefit. However, the Lord makes a connection between one’s earthly stewardship and his eternal stewardship. “Stewardship” means the office of a steward. The Lord says, “If therefore ye have not been faithful in the unrighteous mammon, who will commit to your trust the true riches? … “Ye cannot serve God and mammon” (Lk. 16.11, 13).

As has been pointed out, “steward,” in one context, has the same meaning as “trustee.” So why not use “steward” instead of using derivatives of the word “trust,” to include “trustee.” The conclusion will answer this question; but first, let us take a further look at “steward” and “trust.”

God entrusted mankind with all possessions, real and personal as well as spiritual. He owned all things—even the body, soul and spirit of man—but left all things, including the real estate, to man to be used for Him. God trusted man with all His earthly and eternal possessions. God committed all to man’s trust. He was “steward” or “trustee,” the one to whom God entrusted management and care of His possessions.

Now, let us examine the terms “steward” and “stewardship” from a Bible perspective. Then we will look more at “trust” and related terms—“trustor,” “trustee,” and “trust estate.”

The term “steward” is found in Genesis 15.2, 43.19, 44.1, 44.4; 1 Kings 16.9; Daniel 1.11; Matthew 20.8; Luke 8.3, 12.42; 16.1,2, 3, 8; 1 Corinthians 4.1,2; Titus 1:7. The word “stewardship” is used only three times in the Bible, all in Luke 16, verses 2, 3, and 4. “Stewardship” simply means “The office of a steward.”

A steward is a man who has charge of another’s goods. As defined in the Webster’s 1828 Dictionary, “steward” means: “(1) A man employed in great families to manage the domestic concerns, superintend the other servants, collect the rents or income, keep the accounts, &c. See Gen. xv. 2—xliii. (2) In Scripture and theology, a minister of Christ, whose duty is to dispense the provisions of the gospel, to preach its doctrines and administer its ordinances. It is required in stewards, that a man be found faithful. 1 Cor. iv.”

The first meaning of “steward” is reflected in several passages of the Bible: Genesis 15.2, 43.19, 44.1, 44.4; 1 Kings 16.9; Matthew 20.8; Luke 8.3, 12.42, 16.1-13 (parable of the unjust steward). Certainly, although not directly dealing with the eternal meaning, many of those stewardships have spiritual applications: Matthew 20.8; Luke 12.42-48 (levels of punishment based upon whether or not the steward knew the Lord’s will), 16.1-13.

The eternal application alone is seen in 1 Corinthians 4.1, 2: “Let a man so account of us, as of the ministers of Christ, and stewards of the mysteries of God.  Moreover it is required in stewards, that a man be found faithful.”; and Titus 1.7: “For a bishop must be blameless, as the steward of God; not selfwilled, not soon angry, not given to wine, no striker, not given to filthy lucre.”.

The story of a rich man and his unjust steward, which is related in Luke 16.1-13, is very instructive. The terms “trust” and “steward” are used in that parable. The master committed his goods to the steward’s trust (verses 1 and 11). The master was the beneficiary—“the true, beneficial, and equitable owner.”

The steward in this parable was an out-and-out-crook. He was guilty of malfeasance in office and misappropriation of funds. He wasted the goods of his master. His day of reckoning had come (Lk. 16.3). He was afraid of losing his stewardship, felt he could not do manual work, and was ashamed to beg. However, he, like many, was not ashamed to steal (verse 3). He did not repent, nor did he have regret or remorse for his actions. He was crooked—called “clever” by the world’s standards. He had no training for other work, his age was probably against him, he was too proud to beg, but he was not ashamed to be dishonest. He called all his master’s debtors and gave them big discounts.

The Bible tells us that the world loves its own but hates those who belong to God. “If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before it hated you. If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you” (Jn. 15:18-19). In Galatians 1.3-4, Paul says, “Grace be to you and peace from God the Father, and from our Lord Jesus Christ, Who gave himself for our sins, that he might deliver us from this present evil world, according to the will of God and our Father.” Again, in Romans 12.2, Paul says, “And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.” “Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him” (1 Jn. 2:15).

The first commandment of the world is “self-preservation.” A shady business deal is winked at, questionable practices countenanced, and a clever crook is commended by the world. The law is on the side of the crook and the criminal many times. Every man, according to the world’s law, is innocent until proven guilty. God takes the opposite approach. God says that a man is guilty until proven innocent. “For all have sinned and come short of the glory of God” (Ro. 3.23). A man can never be innocent before God, but he can be justified before Him. When a man trusts Jesus Christ as his Savior, he is justified by faith. See, e.g., Ro. 8.1.

The master did not punish the unjust steward, but commended him. Apparently the rich man got rich using the same kind of principles that his unjust steward used and he commended him, saying that the steward had done wisely. In what way? According to the principles of the world. This is the world that hates Christ. It makes its own rules. The law of the world is “dog eat dog.” The worldly master commended his worldly steward for his worldly wisdom according to his worldly dealings. The Lord Jesus said, “… For the children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light.” That is, the children of this world, of this age, use their money more wisely than do the children of light.

Then, our Lord makes the most shocking and startling statement of all. It concerns the relationship of the “mammon of righteousness,” that is, riches, money: “Make to yourselves friends of the mammon of unrighteousness; that, when ye fail, they may receive you into everlasting habitations” (Lk. 16.9). Money is not evil in itself; it is amoral. The love of money is the root of all evil. For believers, money is to be spiritual. Our Lord said that we should lay up for ourselves treasures in heaven. We should be wise in the way we use our money. Then when we “fail” or come to the end of life, we will be welcomed in heaven.

Believers are spiritual stewards (trustees) of all that God commits to their trust; all of which is spiritual. We own nothing as believers. We are responsible to God for how we use His goods. We are to use the “mammon of unrighteousness” to gather spiritual wealth:

• “He that is faithful in that which is least is faithful also in much: and he that is unjust in the least is unjust also in much. If therefore ye have not been faithful in the unrighteous mammon, who will commit to your trust the true riches?  And if ye have not been faithful in that which is another man’s, who shall give you that which is your own. No servant can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.” (Lk. 16.10-13).

In this parable, the Lord Jesus is saying, “Do you think God is going to trust you with heavenly riches if you are not using properly or rightly the earthly possessions which He has given you?” Are you serving God or mammon? You cannot serve both.

Now, let us review and supplement “trust” and related terms. “Trustor,” “trustee,” and “trust estate” are derivatives of the word “trust,” a concept found throughout the Bible. The suffix “-ee” added to trust results in a new word meaning a person with to whom something is entrusted. A “trustor” is one who entrusts monies and properties to a “trustee” who holds the money and property entrusted to him in “trust” for the benefit of the true, equitable, and beneficial owner, the “beneficiary.”

Some meanings of trust, as given in the 1828 Webster’s Dictionary, are: “(1) Confidence; a reliance or resting of the mind on the integrity, veracity, justice, friendship or other sound principle of another person. He that putteth his trust in the Lord shall be safe. Proverbs 20.25. (2) Something committed to a person’s care for use or management, and for which an account must be rendered. Every man’s talents and advantages are a trust committed to him by his Maker, and for the use or employment of which he is accountable.” In the context of definition (2), the word “trust” is mentioned four times in the Bible:

1. “But as we were allowed of God to be put in trust with the gospel, even so we speak; not as pleasing men, but God, which trieth our hearts” (1 Thes. 2.4).
2. “According to the glorious gospel of the blessed God, which was committed to my trust” (1 Ti. 1:11).
3. “O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called” (1 Ti. 6:20).
4. “If therefore ye have not been faithful in the unrighteous mammon, who [what trustor] will commit to your trust the true riches? And if ye have not been faithful in that which is another man’s, who shall give you that which is your own” (Lk. 16:11-12)?

In all these references, that which God entrusted was not material and spiritual, but spiritual only—“the true riches.”

The Lord spoke of this concept of trust, in conjunction with an earthly temporal example in Matthew 25.14-30 and Luke 19.12-27, although He used neither the word “trust” nor “steward” or “stewardship.” He spoke of an earthly master leaving certain amounts of his goods or money with his servants, according to their abilities. Actually, the more important parallel spiritual meaning was to the Lord and His servants. The master had an absolute right to his own goods, but he distributed to his servants to be used for the benefit of the master, the servants to be awarded according to their profitable use of the property entrusted to them. Some used the money productively and upon the master’s return presented him with a profit. The property belonged to the master, and the servants were to use it for the master’s benefit, not for their own benefit. Of course, they would be rewarded if they used the property wisely for the benefit of the master. One servant in each example returned only the original amount left in trust with them. The master instructed that the goods which he had left with the unprofitable servants be taken from them, and they were left with nothing. The profitable servants were rewarded by the master. In the story found in Matthew, the Master said, “[C]ast ye the unprofitable servant into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth” (Mt. 25.30). Men, as servants of the Master are likewise left in trust of all things for His benefit and will be rewarded or punished accordingly.

In conclusion, the words “steward” and “trustee” signify the same thing. However, the use of the term “trustee,” a word derived from the word “trust” by adding the suffix “-ee”  is preferable to the use of “steward” when describing the entire relationship. Why? For six reasons taken together. First, in only one context do the terms “steward” and “trustee” mean the same thing.

Second, the one time “trust” and “steward” are used in the same immediate verses, “steward” denotes the person with the responsibility over another’s goods and “trust” is used to signify the fiduciary relationship with the master’s goods or property (Lk. 16). Even though “steward” is the one with the duty to rightly administer the goods the master commits to his trust, the name given to the arrangement is “trust.”

Third, nowhere in the Bible are all the terms involved in the relationship reduced to singular (as “trustor”) or modified terms (as “trustee” or “trust estate”); yet, those terms accurately explain elements of the trust relationship even though the specific terms are not in the Bible.

Thus, fourth, the use of “trust” and derivatives is more practical. The term “trust” as a noun (and as an adjective) and its derivatives, more succinctly describe aspects of the relationship: “trustor,” “trustee,” and “trust estate.” On the other hand, the term “stewardship” is less adaptable: one can interchange “steward” and “trustee;” but the word “trust” describes the overall relationship. No word derived from “steward” or from which “steward is derived” describes the person who declares the stewardship (the “trustor”). No word derived from “steward” or from which “steward is derived” describes the estate the steward is responsible for (“trust estate”)—er, perhaps the “stewardship estate?”; but stewardship means the office of a steward. Parallel words leave less room for argument and misunderstanding. Imagine trying to explain these matters to a lost person.

Fifth, the church, not God, declares a Bible Trust relationship with property. To repeat: “Steward” refers to the person to whom someone commits the care and management of his goods for his benefit. In the church Bible Trust context, the church, the trustor, not God, consistent with Bible principle, commits the care and management of God’s goods for God’s benefit.

Finally, American law, although not legalizing or setting up the Bible concept of trust, recognizes and defines the trust elements consistent with Bible principle. American law uses the Bible term “trust” and its derivatives.  For example, American Jurisprudence 2d Trusts, a highly regarded encyclopedia of American law, describes “trust” in § 1, as follows:

• “The fundamental nature of a trust is the division of title, with the trustee being the holder of legal title and the beneficiary that of equitable title. By definition, the creation of a trust must involve a conveyance of property.
• “A ‘trust’ exists where the legal title to property is held by one or more persons, under an equitable obligation to convey, apply, or deal with such property for the benefit of other persons. A trust has been defined as a fiduciary relationship with respect to property, subjecting the person by whom the title to the property is held to equitable duties to deal with the property for the benefit of another person, which arises as a result of a manifestation of an intention to create it. The Restatement definition is similar, providing that a trust, when not qualified by the word ‘resulting’ or ‘constructive,’ is a fiduciary relationship with respect to property, arising from a manifestation of intention to create that relationship and subjecting the person who holds title to the property to duties to deal with it for the benefit of charity or for one or more persons, at least one of whom is not the sole trustee.
• “Caution: A trust consists not only of property, but also of the trust instrument, the trust’s beneficiaries and trustees, and the trust administrator [if any].”

American Jurisprudence 2d, Trusts § 2 makes clear that a “trust” is not a legal entity, but merely a fiduciary relationship with property. For one thing, this means that the one cannot sue the trust, since it is not recognized as a legal entity. This is not true of a “business trust,” a “charitable trust” or some other legal extensions of the “trust” relationship.

Even though particular words are not necessary to create the Bible Trust relationship, as a study of God’s Word reveals, using certain words is a simplified way of declaring the Bible Trust relationship. “No particular words are necessary to declare a trust if there exists reasonable certainty as to the intended property, object, and beneficiary. Further, the purpose and intention, rather than the use of any particular term, determines whether a valid trust has been established.” American Jurisprudence 2d, Trusts § 65. The preservation of God’s Word exactly as inspired by the Holy Spirit is very important to God. See, e.g., Psalm 12:6-7, Deuteronomy 4:1-2, Proverbs 30:5-6; Revelation 22:19. Within those Words are concepts which God wishes His children to understand, apply, and obey.

The important thing for the born-again believer, regardless of the terms used, is that he handle the use of God’s properties, both material and spiritual, according to the principle of trust as described in the Bible. Those faithful and wise churches who remain under God only will be blessed by their Lord. However, churches who choose to leave their first love by placing themselves at least partially under the state (for example, corporate (aggregate or sole) 501(c)(3) or 508(c)(1)(A) churches), have left their first love and betrayed their Lord’s trust. They are unfaithful and act unwisely; they act either knowingly or unknowingly and will  be judged accordingly (see Lk. 12.42-48; see also Lk. 16 discussed above).

Click here to go to the following webpage for Table of Contents with links to all chapters of: Simply Church: The Holy Union of Christ and His Local Church

Appendix 1 gives links to resources which explain why church incorporation, federal tax exempt status, and other statutory or legal status of churches betray the love relationship between Christ and His churches.

Appendix 2 looks at common law versus statutory law church Bible Trust considerations.

Jerald Finney
February 7, 2023

A church who practices New Testament doctrine concerning the trust relationship with property can nullify that relationship when she acts legally. By acting legally, a church places herself under another jurisdiction for many purposes. There are two ways a church may act legally. (1) Churches combine with the state—through contracting with a state for statutory status (incorporation, charitable trust, etc.) or the federal government for tax exempt status under Internal Revenue Code § 501(c)(3) or § 508(c)(1)(A). See, Church Internal Revenue Code § 508(c)(1)(A) Tax Exempt Status and the essays linked to thereon for explanation. (2) Other churches who do not contract with the state or federal government through some statutory means simply act legally and thereby become legal entities subject to civil government jurisdiction for many purposes.

Churches who act legally are legal entities who have given up much of their First Amendment status and placed themselves under the Fourteenth Amendment for many purposes. A legal entity is an entity that can be sued, sue, charged with a crime, enter into contracts, or act legally in some other way.

A legal entity is a creature which is entirely distinct from a spiritual entity. See, Short Answers to Some Important Questions for explanations of matters such as the meaning of “legal entity” and “spiritual entity.” A corporation, for example, is an “artificial person” with no soul to save and no body to resurrect. See, for explanation, Corporation: A human being without a soul. In other words, when a church acts in a temporal worldly matter, that church becomes a legal entity and subjects herself to man’s law and the courts of the world as opposed to a spiritual entity subject to Christ and Christ alone. That church has “left her first love” by joining herself with another lover. She has chosen to abandon her First Amendment spiritual only status in favor of Fourteenth Amendment legal status and civil government control and jurisdiction for many purposes.

Remember, should a church who is not a legal entity be named in a criminal or civil suit, she should not submit to suit; the pastor or another mature church member with knowledge, wisdom, and understanding of these matters should make a special appearance contesting jurisdiction of the court over the church, pointing out that the church is not an earthly legal entity subject to court jurisdiction. The court cannot claim jurisdiction over a non-legal entity.

How can a non-statutory church act legally? She can, for example, hold a credit card, hold deed to real property, open a bank account, get an Employee Identification Number (EIN), hold title to motor vehicle(s), hold insurance, contract, borrow money, incorporate the church or a ministry of the church, apply for or claim federal tax-exempt status for the church or a ministry of the church, have employees, pay salaries, adopt a constitution and/or by-laws or do anything else in accordance with or subject to man’s legal system and not according to New Testament church guidelines and example. Our Lord looks at only one disregarded aspect of honoring the church relationship with Him as a serious infraction, especially when committed knowingly. Negligence and recklessness are no excuse. Church members should be diligent in the matter of the purity of God’s churches.

A church who holds insurance admits that she is a legal worldly entity who can be sued. Should a church Bible Trust obtain insurance (such as liability insurance on real estate) in the name of the trust, the insurance policy does not implicate the church. Some trustees get insurance in the name of the trust, but the insurance policy explicitly covers the church. The trustee must be careful to  make sure that the policy is not a church policy with the name of the trust on it. Insurance sellers are not familiar with the church Bible Trust and will, if the trustee of the trust allows, simply put the name of the trust on the standard church policy, thereby nullifying the Bible Trust by setting the church up as a legal entity.

A pastor of a church may also compromise the position of the church as a church under Christ alone by taking a license from the state to act in a pastoral capacity; a license to conduct marriage ceremonies, for example.

God gave churches and civil government distinct jurisdictions. However, he gave neither jurisdiction over the other. See, God Betrayed/Separation of Church and State: The Biblical Principles and the American Applicaiton. As long as a church honors God’s principles, no civil government has God-given jurisdiction over that church. The First Amendment to the Constitution and corresponding state constitutional provisions recognize this Bible principle. There are two caveats: (1) States allow churches a choice: remain under Christ alone or contract with the state for legal status. (2) The Federal government allows churches to apply for legal status under Internal Revenue Code § 501(c)(3) or claim such status under§  508(c)(1)(A). ). See, Church Internal Revenue Code § 508(c)(1)(A) Tax Exempt Status and the essays linked to thereon for explanation.

God gave civil government authority to punish evildoers and reward those who do good:: jurisdiction over any evil doer, to include church members, who commit crime or violate their duty to another or others and thereby injure them. However, God gave civil government no jurisdiction over individuals who do good and honor God. A civil government who acts outside its God-given jurisdiction is tyrannical. In a tyrannical nation—such as North Korea, China, and many other nations—individual believers who come to the attention of the state are summarily executed, tortured, or imprisoned. No matter, “churches and believers should obey God rather than man,” even to the point of martyrdom. A tyrannical civil government such as North Korea can kill the body but cannot send the body, soul, and spirit to hell.

A properly implemented trust relationship with money and/or property keeps a church entirely out of man’s earthly legal systems and under the Lord Jesus Christ in all things. That is, if the church does not misstep and declare herself to be a legal entity subject to the law of man in some other way. Thank the Lord and the martyrs of Jesus who, in putting Christ first in all things, paid the price that led to the protections of religious freedom and soul liberty in First Amendment to the United States Constitution and corresponding state constitutional provisions; churches in America can do things God’s way without persecution. Sadly, only a small remnant do so.

Click here to go to the following webpage for Table of Contents with links to all chapters of: Simply Church: The Holy Union of Christ and His Local Church

Appendix 1 gives links to resources which explain why church incorporation, federal tax exempt status, and other statutory or legal status of churches betray the love relationship between Christ and His churches.

Appendix 2 looks at common law versus statutory law church Bible Trust considerations.

Jerald Finney
January 19, 2023

The Basics

The church Bible Trust is a plan or concept of God in Scripture, as Chapter 6 explains. The church who honors this plan does not organize as a trust; rather, she declares and practices the same relationship with property as did churches in the New Testament.

The Bible Trust is a fiduciary relationship with real and personal property (personal property includes intangible property such as money and bank accounts). This relationship is recognized, but not created by, man’s law. It is created by an agreement between a trustor and trustee, is private, creates no contract with the state (the state is not a party), and is not subject to control by civil government and its courts. Trust documents, if any, are never required to be filed in man’s legal system through any of its courts or agencies. Under both the common law and statutory law, if applicable, oral trusts are recognized. Upon petition by an interested party regarding trust affairs and/or administration, a court may, if proper, take jurisdiction over any issue or issues raised. Court decisions will be based upon the common law and/or statutes of the state, as well as principles of equity.

A church does not apply to the state, according to state law, for Bible Trust status, as with a corporation, charitable trust, business trust, or some other type of legal organization. No trust papers are filed with the state because the trust relationship is private. A church who declares the Bible Trust Relationship with property, either orally or in writing, remains totally under the authority of the Lord Jesus Christ and His word as long as she does not act as a legal entity. Even a deed naming, for example “the Lord Jesus Christ” and signed by two deacons, for example, is a written declaration of the trust relationship; the deacons who sign the deed are “trustees” even though another term is used. However, the used of an document which declares the trust relationship and all related matters is the best way to declare the relationship for numerous reasons.

The trustee(s) of trust holds and manages, according to his (their) fiduciary duty, the property in the trust estate for the benefit of the true owner of the property, the Lord Jesus Christ, not for the church. Gifts are to God and are held in His trust estate, not in a corporate or a church bank account. The trustee is the legal (temporary earthly) owner of the property and the Lord Jesus Christ is the true, equitable, and beneficial owner.

The trustor implicitly or explicitly declares the relationship and names a trustee who agrees to administer a trust estate funded by the trustor (and others, if any, who wish to contribute to the trust estate) solely for the benefit of another, the true owner of the trust estate, the beneficiary (the Lord Jesus Christ). The trustor merely establishes the trust relationship. The trustee administers the trust estate solely for the benefit of the owner of the trust estate. Once assets are placed in the trust estate, those assets are owned by the beneficiary, the true owner of the property in the trust estate, and are to be used according to his will.

The Elements

Since a Bible Trust relationship is one in which church reaches an agreement with a person to hold and manage property for the benefit of the owner of the property, the Lord Jesus Christ, convenient, but not necessary, terms for the elements of the relationship are trustor, trustee, beneficiary, and trust estate.

A trustor or settlor is the one who establishes a trust agreement. God was trustor of all things. He appointed man as trustee. The earth and the things that are in it compose the earthly trust estate of the trust relationship with property established by God, the beneficiary (true, equitable, and beneficial owner of the earth and all that is in it).

A church can implicitly operate according to God’s plan of organization by observing God’s concept of trust without written documents as a spiritual entity only. Either way, every church who declares the Bible Trust, and the mature church members, should understand its principles and application. In order for the trustee to, for example, open a trust bank account to hold God’s money, or to hold title to real estate to be used for a meetinghouse, the church must declare the relationship in writing. Every mature church member should understand, among other things:

1. That the elements of the trust relationship are trustor, trustee, trust estate, and beneficiary.
2. That the trustor church declares the trust relationship and appoints a trustee:
3. That the trustee agrees to become the legal (earthly, temporal) owner of the trust estate. He agrees to hold and manage the trust estate solely for the benefit of the Lord Jesus Christ, the owner of the trust estate, according to His will as expressed in His Word, the Holy King James Bible. The trustee receives no compensation for serving as trustee.
4. That the trustee has a fiduciary duty to use the trust estate for purposes consistent with the will of God as laid out in God’s Word.
5. That the beneficiary, the Lord Jesus Christ, is the true, equitable, and beneficial owner of everything in the trust estate.
6. That all ll property in the trust estate is to be held and managed by the trustee, the legal (earthly) owner of the trust estate, solely for the benefit of and according to the will of the true, equitable and beneficial owner of the property, the Lord Jesus Christ.

An inactive trust is no trust at all. Without all four elements, there is no trust relationship with property. There must be a trustor, a trustee, a beneficiary, and a trust estate.  If no property is in the trust estate, there is no trust relationship with property and no Bible trust. Some churches have properly drafted and executed documents establishing a proper trust relationship in order to remain under the Lord Jesus Christ only; but they have nullified their efforts by never listing trust property to the trust estate in an appendix to the trust document. All property and assets in the trust estate should be listed in the appendix. Again, if no property is placed in the trust estate, the trust is non-existent. The Appendix should list all personal property (song books, pews, musical instruments, etc., checking account, real property, motor vehicles, and other assets held in trust estate.

Real property in the trust estate, if any, is held in the name of the trust, or in the name of the trustee as follows: “John Doe, Trustee of ABC Trust]. Should property be held in the name of the trust, the trustee is the legal owner of the trust (the one who holds and manages the property in the trust estate solely for the benefit of the true owner of the property, the Lord Jesus Christ)]. Both the state and the Lord require someone to hold temporary earthly title to His real property. As to property on which a church meets, if no one holds legal title and if it is brought to the attention of the state, the state will declare someone to be legal owner of that property.

Titles to motor vehicles, if any, in the trust estate are held in the name of the trust, or by the trustee as follows: John Doe, Trustee of ABC Trust.

Banks accounts, if any, holding funds in the trust estate are held in the name of the trust, or by the trustee as follows: John Doe, Trustee of ABC Trust.

The pastor should be trustee named in a church Bible trust agreement although a deacon or other mature male church member can serve as trustee. The pastor should be as qualified or more qualified as any man in the church to hold and manage God’s earthly property. Of course, the pastor can appoint others to perform certain duties; but he is the one ultimately responsible. See Endnote [i]. The trust relationship can be modified to accommodate churches who are led by a plurality of elders.

The trust document, if any, should include language which prohibits the trustee from using any property, or proceeds from the conveyance of any property in the trust estate, for the benefit of himself or anyone else. The document should make clear that in no event will the ownership of any property in the trust estate ever inure to the benefit of or be transferred to any member or members of the church except as consistent with Bible guidelines. For example, “Even so hath the Lord ordained that they which preach the gospel should live of the gospel” (1 Corinthians 9:14).

A written document declaring the trust relationship with property should include language such as:

“God, as declared in His Word has designated the Lord Jesus Christ to be the true, equitable, and beneficial owner of the earth and all that is in it (Exodus 19:5, Leviticus 25:23, 1 Chronicles 29:11-12, Psalm 24:1, Psalm 50:10, Psalm 89:11, Haggai 2:8). This document is merely declaring that truth:

• “The Beneficiary of this Trust is the Lord Jesus Christ, and all of the properties of the Trust Estate are held in Trust, by the Trustee, solely for the benefit of the Lord Jesus Christ who is the true, equitable, and beneficial owner of all property including all property held in Trust.”
  

  ---

Endnote

[i] Timothy was a preacher with a special position of trust. Timothy was a trustee of a spiritual heritage: “O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:” (1 Ti. 6.20). Likewise, elders, which includes pastors, must meet specific requirements which not every man in a church can meet. (See, for example, Tit. 1.5-9). An elder must hold fast the Word of God, “that he may be able by sound doctrine both to exhort and to convince the gainsayers” (Tit. 1.9-16, 2.2; see also, Ac. 11.30, 14.23, (ordained elders in every church), 15.2, 4, 6, 22-23, 16.4, 20.17, 21.18; 1 Ti. 5.1 (“rebuke not an elder, but entreat him as a father”), 1 Ti. 5.17-19; Ja. 5.14-15; He. 13.7, 17; 1 Pe. 5.1 (Peter the Apostle was an elder, here writing to “the elders who are among you”; 1 Pe. 5.5 (younger to submit to the elder, and all to submit to one another); 2 Jn. 1 and 3 Jn. 1 (John the Apostle was also an elder);

Biblically, a pastor must meet stringent God-given requirements:

• “This is a true saying, If a man desire the office of a bishop [pastor], he desireth a good work. A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach; Not given to wine, no striker, not greedy of filthy lucre; but patient, not a brawler, not covetous; One that ruleth well his own house, having his children in subjection with all gravity; (For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?) Not a novice, lest being lifted up with pride he fall into the condemnation of the devil.  Moreover he must have a good report of them which are without; lest he fall into reproach and the snare of the devil.” (1 Ti. 3.1-7).
• “For a bishop must be blameless, as the steward of God; not selfwilled, not soon angry, not given to wine, no striker, not given to filthy lucre;” (Tit. 1.7).

These requirements are strict because a pastor, and every member of a church, is entrusted by God to “take care of the church of God.” (1 Ti. 3.5).

“The elders [pastors included] which are among you I exhort, who am also an elder, and a witness of the sufferings of Christ, and also a partaker of the glory that shall be revealed: Feed the flock of God which is among you, taking the oversight thereof, not by constraint, but willingly; not for filthy lucre, but of a ready mind; Neither as being lords over God’s heritage, but being ensamples to the flock. And when the chief Shepherd shall appear, ye shall receive a crown of glory that fadeth not away.” (1 Pe. 5.1-5).

The Bible proclaims: “Remember them which have the rule over you, who have spoken unto you the Word of God: whose faith follow, considering the end of their conversation.” (He. 13.7). “Obey them that have the rule over you, and submit yourselves: for they watch for your souls, as they that must give account, that they may do it with joy, and not with grief: for that is unprofitable for you.” ( He. 13.17). “Salute all them that have the rule over you, and all the saints….” (He. 13.24). “Them” is plural, and includes the pastor and other elders of a church.

The elders, including the pastor, are to oversee a church: “Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood.” (Ac. 20.28). Paul was speaking to the elders of the church at Ephesus (Ac. 20.17-18).

A pastor is responsible to act as a ruler, trustee, steward, and overseer of a church. As such, he should be as qualified as any other church member to be the trustee of God’s trust estate.

Click here to go to the following webpage for Table of Contents with links to all chapters of: Simply Church: The Holy Union of Christ and His Local Church

Appendix 1 gives links to resources which explain why church incorporation, federal tax exempt status, and other statutory or legal status of churches betray the love relationship between Christ and His churches.

Appendix 2 looks at common law versus statutory law church Bible Trust considerations.

Jerald Finney
January 17, 2023

Acting without knowledge, understanding and wisdom is not prudent for the believer who loves, or says he or she loves, the Lord. A believer and a church cannot love and glorify God by just following what someone else says. Sadly, most churches and believers act on the matter of church organization without thinking and as instructed by unthinking pastors, Bible Colleges, Seminaries, “Christian” media, and/or “Christian” lawyers and law firms. They act on misinformation without checking it out against the Word of God. Before organizing a church, they should fully answer and understand answers to questions like:

• Does God desire union of church and state or separation of church and state?
• What is church incorporation and federal tax exemption?
• Do church incorporation and federal tax exemption establish unholy alliances with another lover?
• Do church incorporation and federal tax exemption violate Bible principle and displease our Lord?
• What is the Bible Trust relationship with property?
• Is the Bible Trust relationship with property Biblical?
• And the list goes on. For a thorough look at answers to all the above and many more relevant questions, see the resources linked to in Appendix 1.

Local church use of the Bible Trust for holding and managing properties given to God for use according to His will comports with New Testament Church Doctrine. The heavens, the earth and all that are in them belong to God.[1] God entrusts man with all His earthly property, and he entrusts His children with all things spiritual. An individual, a family, a nation, and a church are to hold and manage God’s property for his glory. A church should do a thorough Holy Spirit led study of the Word of God concerning God’s principles for church organization, and the Bible Trust Concept and its application.

This Section will explain God’s Bible Trust Doctrine. The Bible Trust does not organize a church as a trust. it is nothing more than a fiduciary relationship with property which is recognized, but not created, by man’s law Although it is not a product of man’s law, a court will entertain a petition by an interested party involving trust affairs or misuse. If jurisdiction of such a matter is accepted by the court, the court will look to the common law and/or statutory law for guidelines in deciding the issues raised.

Chater 6. The Bible Trust Relationship with Property is Not Something New: It was God’s plan starting with Adam and Eve covers the concept of God’s Bible Trust and its application by New Testament churches. For example, no church in the New Testament owned property. Why? Because those churches were eternal spiritual organisms made up of children of God indwelt by the Holy Spirit, not temporal worldly organizations.[2] Never were they told to put Caesar above God as to heavenly matters, those things having to do with their relationship with God. As to those matters, they were to “obey God rather than men.”[3] Of course, they were also worldly citizens of their nation, but their duty to the nation was temporal. They were instructed to be ideal earthly citizens who also, as members of local churches, were to go out of their churches into all the world and perform a spiritual heavenly mission, the preaching of the gospel.[4]

Oh, that we believers could have the attitude, actions, and goal of the Apostle Paul expressed in Philippians 3:7-14:

“7 But what things were gain to me, those I counted loss for Christ. 8 Yea doubtless, and I count all things but loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord: for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and do count them but dung, that I may win Christ, 9 And be found in him, not having mine own righteousness, which is of the law, but that which is through the faith of Christ, the righteousness which is of God by faith: 10 That I may know him, and the power of his resurrection, and the fellowship of his sufferings, being made conformable unto his death; 11 If by any means I might attain unto the resurrection of the dead. 12 Not as though I had already attained, either were already perfect: but I follow after, if that I may apprehend that for which also I am apprehended of Christ Jesus. 13 Brethren, I count not myself to have apprehended: but this one thing I do, forgetting those things which are behind, and reaching forth unto those things which are before, 14 I press toward the mark for the prize of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus.”

Footnotes

[1] See, e.g., 1 Chronicles 29:11; Psalm 24:1; 89:11-12;  Jeremiah 32:17-24; 2 Corinthians 5:18-20; Colossians 1:16;

[2] See, e.g., Ephesians 4, and 1 Corinthians 12.

[3] Acts, 5:29. See, Render Unto God the Things that Are His: A Systematic Study of Romans 13 and Related Verses (https://jeraldfinney.com/god-betrayed/books/render-unto-god-the-things-that-are-his-a-systematic-study-of-romans-13-and-related-verses/).

[4] Romans 12:17-21, Romans 13:8-10, 1Peter 4:12-19 (the actions of the believer toward those who temporally persecute them for being Christians); Matthew 28:19-20; Mark 16:15; Luke 24:47-48; Acts 1:8.

Click here to go to the following webpage for Table of Contents with links to all chapters of: Simply Church: The Holy Union of Christ and His Local Church

Appendix 1 gives links to resources which explain why church incorporation, federal tax exempt status, and other statutory or legal status of churches betray the love relationship between Christ and His churches.

Appendix 2 looks at common law versus statutory law church Bible Trust considerations.

“Would to God ye could bear with me a little in my folly: and indeed bear with me. For I am jealous over you with godly jealousy: for I have espoused you to one husband, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ. But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ” (II Corinthians 11:1-3).

Jerald Finney
January 13, 2023

All individuals and institutions—families, nations, and churches—would do well to go to the Word of God, the Bible, for direction in their affairs. Things would be much simpler, far more fulfilling and rewarding, full of the blessings of God, and free from the judgments of God. Sadly, rarely does this occur. This booklet is concerned only with the matter of doing things God’s way, the Bible way, in the matter of the ordering the God-ordained institution of the church made up of local churches in their relationships to the God-ordained institution of civil government.

Doing things God’s way in the matter of local church organization is really simple, very simple. On the other hand, organizing a church man’s way is very complex, changes the very nature of a church from an eternal, heavenly organization to a temporal, earthly organization, and brings in man-made complexities that change the nature and functioning of a church. Joining church and state combines an temporal earthly power (civil government) with an eternal heavenly power (the local church). Such unions either place the church over the state, the state over the church, or makes them coequal partners. As history amply proves, all such unions inevitably corrupt the church, the state, and the people.

In America, churches may, without persecution, choose either to remain in relationship with Christ alone or to enter into an unholy union with state government (e.g., through non-profit corporation status and/or federal government “tax-exempt” status). A church who chooses to enter into unholy union with the state grieves our Lord, starts a slide toward heresy and apostasy, and profanes that which God desires, according to His Word, to remain holy, set apart for Him and Him alone.

God wishes the relationship of both husband and wife and Christ and his churches to be holy, set apart for God. Christ likens the relationship between his churches to the marriage relationship: “Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it; That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word, That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish.” (Ephesians 5:25-27).

Christ paid a high price for the local churches. He has given church leaders a great responsibility in maintaining their holy status. “Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood” (Acts 20:28).

Suppose that one day, John Smith is at home when his wife Alice walks in the front door with her arms around another man, Joe. Alice says to her husband John,

“Hello, dear. I want you to meet Joe. I met him a couple of months ago and he and I have become good friends. We have talked over the phone and had lunch together a few times. That’s all. I have found him to be a very wise and compassionate man, concerned with my well-being, and yours as well. He has some wonderful suggestions as to how this marriage should be run. His ways are much better than your ways as to many matters. I think we should bring him into our relationship for wise counseling and direction. Not only that, he is a rich man and wants to help us out financially. You must agree with me that this new relationship will be far better?”

What would a husband who loved his wife say to her in this eventuality?

Sadly, most churches, like Eve, have been beguiled by the serpent through his subtilty, so that their minds have been corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ. They have left their first love as did the church at Ephesus. They have chosen to combine with the state. They usually do so through contracting with the state and federal government for non-profit corporation status, federal tax-exempt status, charitable trust status. Some few do so by setting themselves up as legal entities by acting legally, entities subject to civil government control. A church acts legally when, for example, she takes out insurance on the church, holds property in the name of the church, opens a bank account in the name of the church.[1]

Churches have followed the wrong advice in structuring their relationship with the state. Many know that the example of the churches in the Word of God is complete separation of church and state. Nonetheless, they argue that times have changed and that churches can no longer follow the doctrine and practice of the original New Testament churches. They reason that the church must combine with the state:

1. So that she can own property, hold a bank account, or act legally in some other manner.
2. So that she can enter into contracts.
3. To limit the liability of church members.
4. So that one’s tithes, offerings and gifts will be tax deductible.
5. Winning souls is the most important thing, even more important than loving God.
6. My “Christian” lawyer disagrees with your opinion and advises me such and such.
7. The church must combine with the state according to Romans 13, 1 Peter 2:13, or some other Scripture.
8. The Word of God teaches that a church can choose to either combine with the state or not and that one should follow his convictions on the matter.
9. ad nauseum.

After nineteen years working in the arena of church state relationships, I have found the excuses are seemingly endless. See, [2] for a link to webpages on all related issues including analyses of false reasons for church legal status. Pastors and churches who wish to do things man’s way are always backed up by other pastors, believers Bible colleges, seminaries, churches, and lawyers who will agree with them that their way is the right way. A small minority who have not already come to the knowledge of the truth on the matter defer to the Word of God, study the matter out, repent, and cast aside their unholy alliances.

For two thousand years, a remnant of believes, according to civil and religious laws of those in unholy union with one another, have been persecuted—beheaded, drowned, burned at the stake, mercilessly tortured, imprisoned, banished, deprived of all their property, etc.—because they refused to dishonor their relationship with the Lord Jesus Christ. Except for a small remnant, churches in America choose to profane their relationship with the Lord Jesus Christ by becoming legally entwined with civil government. This is true in spite of the fact that the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and corresponding state constitutional provisions grant religious and soul liberty. Churches in the United States can do things God’s way with the protection of man’s laws.

This booklet will show churches how to do things God’s way, the simple way, as to their relationship with Christ; the same way that New Testament churches did so by following a concept, a plan utilized by God as to both earthly material and heavenly spiritual possessions from the creation of man until the end of time. Keep reading to see if these things are not so.[3]

Endnotes

[1] See Appendix 1 for links to resources which explain in detail why a church commits spiritual fornication and betrays her first love by choosing church corporate status, charitable trust status, federal tax exempt status or legal status of any kind.

[2] “False reasons of Christians and Lawyers for church corporate, 501(c)(3) or 508(c)(1)(A) tax-exempt status or legal status of any kind” (https://jeraldfinney.com/posts/false-reasons-of-christian-lawyers-and-pastors-for-combining-church-and-state/). Other resources which analyze all related questions include: Separation of Church and State: God’s Churches: Spiritual or Legal Entities (https://jeraldfinney.com/god-betrayed/books/separation-of-church-and-state-gods-churches-spiritual-or-legal-entities/ ); God Betrayed/Separation of Church and State: The Biblical Principles and the American Application (https://jeraldfinney.com/god-betrayed/books/god-betrayedseparation-of-church-and-state-the-biblical-principles-and-the-american-application/ ); Essays and articles linked to at https://jeraldfinney.com/miscellaneous-articles/.

[3] The Appendix gives links to resources which explain why church incorporation, federal tax exempt status, and other statutory or legal status of churches create unholy relationships between Christ and his local churches. These relationships are spiritual fornication since, by choosing to engage in them, a church takes on another lover besides the Lord Jesus Christ.

Click here to go to the following webpage for Table of Contents with links to all chapters of: Simply Church: The Holy Union of Christ and His Local Church

Appendix 1 gives links to resources which explain why church incorporation, federal tax exempt status, and other statutory or legal status of churches betray the love relationship between Christ and His churches.

Appendix 2 looks at common law versus statutory law church Bible Trust considerations.

Jerald Finney
January 11, 2023

Revelation 1-3, as well as other New Testament books, have many lessons for the churches. [1] One lesson has to do with the proper motivation for the relationship between Christ and the local church. Just as the relationship of husband wife can be profaned, so can the relationship between a church and Christ:

“Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it; That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word, That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish” (Ephesians 5:25-27).

Just as a husband who does not uncompromisingly love his wife can be guilty of adultery, so can a church who does not love the Lord Jesus Christ with all her heart, soul, mind, and strength. A church can profane her love for the Lord by entering into unholy unions with other lovers, most notably with federal and/or state government.

Motive influences action. Love for Christ is the proper motivation for service, for preaching, teaching, contending for the faith, for good works, for all that the believer and church do.

Revelation 1-3 reveals that Christ is walking in the midst of every one of his churches, inspecting and judging them. He is observing their actions, attitudes, hearts, and motives. He sees their strengths and weaknesses. Every church should study Revelation 1-3 as well as other New Testament Scripture regarding the doctrine of the church so that she can measure, judge, and bring herself into line with the heart of God.

Many churches in America have “left their first love” (Revelation 2:4). Some, like the church at Ephesus, have hard workers who persevere for His name’s sake, work diligently even though weary, remain patient and steadfast, hate and condemn that which is morally wrong, remain moral in spite of surrounding immorality, abhor that which is wrong, hate false teachings, exercise spiritual discernment and keep themselves pure from doctrinal error. They stay in the battle even though it is wearisome to carry on.

Nonetheless, Christ has a solemn rebuke against many of these churches because they have left their first love. He knows their hearts. He knows that their motivation for service is not a love for Him.  The Church at Ephesus once had an unwavering love for Jesus Christ (Acts 19:17-21). However, within a generation, the church membership had an insensitive disregard for Christ and lacked a yieldedness to Him due to their waning love for Him.

Christ commanded the church at Ephesus to “remember.” They were to recall the joy of their salvation that they first experienced when they were abiding in Christ and feeling the peace of God in their hearts.

He then commanded them to repent and do the first works—that is, to return to Him, to a simple faith in, and genuine love for Him, and for what he had done for them on Calvary’s cross. History records the persecutions—burning at the state, beheading, drowning, extreme torture, imprisonment, banishment—of believers in Christ, members of churches who refused to prostitute their churches by remaining true to the Word of God.

The result of failing to heed Christ’s counsel are serious. Christ said that—if the church at Ephesus did not repent—He would cause her to lose her influence to the point that she would no longer exist as a light in the midst of darkness. Eventually, their light did burn out. Like the church at Ephesus, that of any church not motivated by love for the Savior and acting according to His Word is empty and futile. Their light is not shining, and many, because unrepentant, have ceased to exist.

The size of a church is not evidence of favor with God. The church at Philadelphia was small and insignificant compared to the church at Sardis, but God said that the large, “successful” church at Sardis was dead in his sight while this small, unpopular church at Philadelphia was spiritually thriving. (Revelation 3:1-6; 3:7-13). [2]

Endnotes

[1] Much insight for this preface gleaned from, Matt Costello,  “Christ Speaks to the Seven Churches” (Fresno, CA: Fundamentalist Evangelistic Association, http://www.feasite.org).

[2] Appendix 1 gives links to resources which explain why church incorporation, federal tax exempt status, and other statutory or legal status of churches betray the love relationship between Christ and His churches.